Spotlight: Tyrannosaurus rex

PermalinkDinosaur Gallery

Tyrannosaurus v7.png

Tyrannosaurus rex
“Tyrant reptile king”

Specimen Name: Regina (female)
Specimen Height: 4.12 m
Specimen Length: 12.02 m
Specimen Weight: 8.11 tonnes

Tyrannosaurus rex — a name “irresistible to the tongue” (according to Robert Bakker) — has been famous from the start. This animal captured the imagination of the public from the very start. An early-1900s New York Times paper describes it as “the king of kings in the domain of animal life.” And now, T. rex remains among the most popular dinosaurs to enthusiasts and laypeople alike; it ranks highly among other favorites such as TriceratopsBrontosaurusVelociraptor, and Stegosaurus. As such, it is also one of the most scrutinized dinosaurs to interest groups. Was it a scavenger? Was it an active hunter? Was it endothermic? Was it ectothermic? Was there a middle ground? Were the arms useless? What was its bite force? How fast could it run? Could it even run?

Many of these questions have close answers, but I rest my case that Tyrannosaurus is still heavily argued over more than a century after its discovery.

Paleontologists have made strides during that century of study, evolving our perception of Tyrannosaurus from a slow kangaroo-posed reptile to a (relatively) agile and rather birdlike predator. Recently, tyrannosaur integument (skin covering — i.e. bare skin, feathers, scales, keratin plates, and so on) has started to become a topic of interest. The uncovering of Yutyrannus — a tyrannosauroid* from China covered from head-to-tail with feathery down — set an interesting precedence in artistically restoring large tyrannosauroids. However, developments made by Bell et al. suggest that the possible feather “real estate” for Tyrannosaurus rex proper is less substantial than previously thought. Fossilized scale impressions from Tyrannosaurus rex and other related large tyrannosaurs carry the implication that these taxa were predominantly scaly. The paper does not suggest large tyrannosaurs lacked feathers. The authors do suggest that, if feathers were present on the animal, they’d be most likely placed on the dorsal side of the body (the “top”).

This was the first time that scale impressions of Tyrannosaurus & co. were formally described in scientific literature. Paleo artist Mark Witton presents a supplementary argument for adaptive integument (carrying further from one of Bell et al.’s proposals that scales in advanced tyrannosaurs were derived from early tyrannosauroid feather covering) where tyrannosaur taxa integument could change on a population-by-population or even within the same individual over time. The Bell paper is still under tough scrutiny by paleo enthusiasts and professionals everywhere. As one block of text in a sea of comments suggested, “It’s not that T. rex couldn’t be feathered. It’s just the likelihood of scales has increased.”

*Tyrannosauroidea is a taxonomic grouping one step above Tyrannosauridae.

Artist Notes:


This was a tough dinosaur to get through. Not because it was particularly challenging (I’m confident enough with tetanuran theropods to freehand most of ’em), but rather I was unsure of how it’d be received. I was pleasantly surprised to have this animal be my most popular on my Instagram account.

This version of Regina takes some major departures from previous incarnations, the most obvious of which is the lack of a protofeather coat. She does have filaments on her body (top of the neck and on the arms). She also sports a yellow-olive-tan pelt as opposed to my bread-and-butter brown and white. The blue highlight around the eye was a last-minute addition; it’s also unintentionally reminiscent of Jurassic World‘s Baryonyx artwork. I swear it’s a coincidence; great minds think alike.

Regina has a fairly tall keratin “crest” on her snout. This is influenced by ancestral tyrannosauroids such as Guanlong, which had crests with a bony core (not entirely dissimilar to Dilophosaurus). Evidence of vascular structures along the top of the head supports the existence of some type of keratin structure. Another feature I added was taken from Daspletosaurus. Carr et al. published some writing involving facial scales that were analogous to crocodilians.

This is also the first animal I’ve restored with reflective lighting/shading (I refer to both, collectively, as “dynamic overlays”) with greens, blues, and yellows representing where light from the ground, sky, and sun would be hitting the animal from all angles. The effect is subtle, but present.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s